Blogger and Webmaster: "Did Trillanes Deserves the Amnesty Granted Him by Aquino in 2010 to Begin With?" - The Daily Sentry

Wednesday, September 5, 2018



Blogger and Webmaster: "Did Trillanes Deserves the Amnesty Granted Him by Aquino in 2010 to Begin With?"



Photo credit to Get Real Philippines
Popular blog site, Get Real Philippines with it's anonymous yet known writer, Benigno, once again posted a very striking opinion this time regarding the very controversial Senator Antonio Trillanes IV and the latter's recent revocation of amnesty. 

It was reported yesterday that President Rodrigo Duterte has invalidated the grant of amnesty to Senator Antonio Trillanes IV and orders his arrest. The Senator, however as of press time last night, has decided to stay at the Senate premises since other senators agreed that authorities should not be allowed to arrest the opposition lawmaker inside the Senate building to preserve the institution’s dignity.


Trillanes' amnesty was allegedly voided for failure to comply with its minimum requirements and was ordered to be arrested and prosecuted for his involvement in the 2003 Oakwood mutiny and the 2007 Manila Peninsula Hotel siege against the administration of then President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.

Photo credit to Article.wn.com
Now the question, according to GRP's Benigno is "Did Trillanes deserve the amnesty granted him by Aquino in 2010 to begin with?"

As stated by Benigno, the vital point that needs to be discussed in regard to Trillanes' case is actually not the specialized language of the legal profession that is now being circulated in television and social media but rather, to question what the Senator has done to make amends for those crimes that makes him deserving of amnesty in the first place, and whether that amnesty granted by then President Benigno "Noynoy" Aquino III was really legal or not.

The writer thereupon identified Senator Trillanes' crimes one by one that as per him endangered thousand of Filipino lives.

Photo credit to Rappler
Likewise he said that it is apparent that there is definitely no reason for legitimizing such amnesty to any individual who occupied with the kind of military adventurism that Trillanes and his group conveyed, thus, granting him an amnesty then is really questionable.

Benigno then ended his article by asking the same query, challenging the people to answer that question without referring to any of the Oppositions' thoughts and accounts.



Read his full article below:

"Did Trillanes deserve the amnesty granted him by Aquino in 2010 to begin with?"

"At present, much of the chatter surrounding the voiding of the amnesty granted by then President Benigno Simeon ‘BS’ Aquino III to “senator” Antonio Trillanes in 2010 revolves around whether that action was legal or not. That is because lawyers enjoy disproportionate celebrity amongst the chattering cliques of partisans that populate the national discourse. But in so focusing on mere legalities, the Philippines’ foremost “thought leaders” miss the more important points surrounding this circus.

“Senator” Trillanes was one of a number of Filipino ex-military personnel who mounted a rebellion against the government of then President Gloria Arroyo in 2003 and again in 2006. When he came to power in 2010, Aquino issued Proclamation 50 granting amnesty to Trillanes allowing him to escape accountability for these crimes. This raises questions that should be directed to people who supported that proclamation back when it was first granted.

After all, Trillanes’s crimes were really and truly serious. He betrayed the trust Filipinos gave him as an officer in the military and went off to use the resources under his command to mount an assault on a civilian government and endanger thousands of Filipino lives. What has Trillanes done to make amends for those crimes that makes him deserving of amnesty? It seems that the only things that were going for Trillanes then and up to now were quaint narratives spun by partisans who held personal biases.

Back then, no less than the eminent constiutionalist Father Joaquin Bernas issued gushing words to justify Trillanes’s crimes…

They [the alleged mutineers] went through elaborate ceremonies which were meant to be symbolic of their noble goal. They seem to have considered their deed a patriotic feather in their cap and they will willingly assert that, yes, we did, even if we now regret having done it.

The words used in Proclamation 50 itself did not, in any way, articulate any better a justification other than to spell out the following nebulous principles:

(1) “there [was, at the time,] a clamor from certain sectors of society urging the President to extend amnesty to said AFP personnel”

(2) The Constitution says the President can; and,

(3) It was in line with Aquino’s aspiring “to promote an atmosphere conducive to the attainment of a just, comprehensive and enduring peace”

Note that in all of the above, there was no reference to the unresolved question of Trillanes’s culpability as one of the senior officers involved in the alleged rebellions made within the tenets of Proclamation 50. Nor was the unnecessary danger he and his team had exposed innocent civilians to in the course of mounting their alleged adventurism even mentioned.

So now with all that in hindsight, perform a simple thought experiment and strip off all reference to partisan loyalties and any names associated with such loyalties from the above several paragraphs and ask a similar question: Would you support the granting of amnesty to people who enaged in the above activities?

Seen under that light, it quickly becomes evident that there is absolutely no basis for justifying any such amnesty to anyone who engaged in the sort of military adventurism Trillanes and his mob led in the early- to mid-2000s. That is the important point that needs to be discussed — not the perverted legalese being exchanged with verbose pomposity by the many lawyers (and lawyer wannabes) who populate social media chatter. The right question is often the simplest one:

Does “senator” Antonio Trillanes deserve the amnesty granted him by Aquino in 2010 to begin with?

See if you can answer that question without referring to any of the Opposition notions and narratives."



Source: Get Real Philippines